Show your work, get help, participate in development
https://forums.luxcorerender.org/
Honestly, I do not see what you mean. Please copy relevant parts from both versions into one image and mark them clearly. Thanks.lacilaci wrote: Wed Aug 07, 2019 5:51 am This is a problem I reported long ago but now that we have a disney shader we can finaly compare to how things should look at object edges..
look at the weird darkening of glossy:
glossy.jpg
and now disney:
disney.jpg
Really? You don't see any difference?FarbigeWelt wrote: Wed Aug 07, 2019 6:50 amHonestly, I do not see what you mean. Please copy relevant parts from both versions into one image and mark them clearly. Thanks.lacilaci wrote: Wed Aug 07, 2019 5:51 am This is a problem I reported long ago but now that we have a disney shader we can finaly compare to how things should look at object edges..
look at the weird darkening of glossy:
glossy.jpg
and now disney:
disney.jpg
Thank you much for the eye opener in the early morning!lacilaci wrote: Wed Aug 07, 2019 7:39 amReally? You don't see any difference?FarbigeWelt wrote: Wed Aug 07, 2019 6:50 amHonestly, I do not see what you mean. Please copy relevant parts from both versions into one image and mark them clearly. Thanks.lacilaci wrote: Wed Aug 07, 2019 5:51 am This is a problem I reported long ago but now that we have a disney shader we can finaly compare to how things should look at object edges..
look at the weird darkening of glossy:
glossy.jpg
and now disney:
disney.jpg
here, glossy shader in the red rectangle, outside of it is disney:
wat.jpg
Ah yes, on a phone it might be a little problem to spot...FarbigeWelt wrote: Wed Aug 07, 2019 8:50 amThank you much for the eye opener in the early morning!lacilaci wrote: Wed Aug 07, 2019 7:39 amReally? You don't see any difference?FarbigeWelt wrote: Wed Aug 07, 2019 6:50 am
Honestly, I do not see what you mean. Please copy relevant parts from both versions into one image and mark them clearly. Thanks.
here, glossy shader in the red rectangle, outside of it is disney:
wat.jpg
Do not be shocked, spotting the difference at a smartphone display zooming and moving around is not easy if you do not know what you are looking for. At home at 27“ I may have seen what you mean just in a glimpse...
Anyhow, this dark edges are agreedly odd. Looks like enhanced shadow but that makes not any sense, does it?
Yes, definitely. I would use it instead both glossy and matte. Disney is usable for most of materials in cycles too, but they have a bit more advanced implementation which will be probably even more upgraded in near future.(I think some thin translucency will be added)
Yes, they have the SIGGRAPH 2015 additions (i.e. the additional transmission related parameters) while we have the original SIGGRAPH 2012 implementation. But it is not something particularly hard to add in a near future.lacilaci wrote: Wed Aug 07, 2019 9:11 am but they have a bit more advanced implementation which will be probably even more upgraded in near future.(I think some thin translucency will be added)