LuxCoreRender Forums

Posted: **Fri May 29, 2020 4:18 pm**

u3dreal wrote: Fri May 29, 2020 12:35 pm No access to secure file for me .. should i merge ? otherwise no check possible. maybe you can check ..

For increased security, secure files and secret variables are never accessible to pull requests coming from forks.
If you prefer not to act directly on the master branch, you could create another branch in our repo: in that case everything should work.

Posted: **Fri May 29, 2020 4:53 pm**

If you guys have no problem with me committing on my own .. i'm fine with that.

Posted: **Fri May 29, 2020 7:11 pm**

acasta69 wrote: Fri May 29, 2020 4:10 pm I have updated the azure pipeline files for Windows and it's running now. I'll check the binaries as soon as they are available.

About Linux: is it enough to build only the version with neither "opencl" nor "cuda" in the directory name?
Or do you need to modify the build scripts in the "LinuxCompile" repo?

I still need to check/update the Linux build process.

Posted: **Sun May 31, 2020 12:23 pm**

Dade wrote: Fri May 29, 2020 7:11 pm
acasta69 wrote: Fri May 29, 2020 4:10 pm I have updated the azure pipeline files for Windows and it's running now. I'll check the binaries as soon as they are available.

About Linux: is it enough to build only the version with neither "opencl" nor "cuda" in the directory name?
Or do you need to modify the build scripts in the "LinuxCompile" repo?
I still need to check/update the Linux build process.

I should have now updated everything and, yes, neither "opencl" nor "cuda" in the directory name are required anymore.

Posted: **Sun May 31, 2020 2:51 pm**

Dade wrote: Sun May 31, 2020 12:23 pm I should have now updated everything and, yes, neither "opencl" nor "cuda" in the directory name are required anymore.

I have updated the Azure pipeline files.
BlendLuxCore seems already ok, no modification necessary.

Posted: **Sun May 31, 2020 4:16 pm**

acasta69 wrote: Sun May 31, 2020 2:51 pm BlendLuxCore seems already ok, no modification necessary.

Hmm there are some errors on linux side ... but yes it builds but only linux-opencl ..
I would do it but i have no clue what files are needed for linux

Posted: **Sun May 31, 2020 4:36 pm**

u3dreal wrote: Sun May 31, 2020 4:16 pm Hmm there are some errors on linux side ... but yes it builds but only linux-opencl ..

Do you mean this one?
https://dev.azure.com/LuxCoreRender/Lux ... a591&l=429

Yes, the "linux64-opencl" archive does not exist any more, I'll remove it from the list.
But I don't see other problems, or have I missed something?

Edit: oh, I see, you probably mean the missing CUDA DLLs. Actually I'm not sure about that as well.

Posted: **Sun May 31, 2020 4:47 pm**

acasta69 wrote: Sun May 31, 2020 4:36 pm Edit: oh, I see, you probably mean the missing CUDA DLLs. Actually I'm not sure about that as well.

jep

Posted: **Sun May 31, 2020 4:50 pm**

well it should be the ones provided with luxcore archive

Posted: **Sun May 31, 2020 8:37 pm**

No none is provided ..

LuxCoreRender Forums

Unified executable (for CPU-only, OpenCL and CUDA)

Re: Unified executable (for CPU-only, OpenCL and CUDA)

Re: Unified executable (for CPU-only, OpenCL and CUDA)

Re: Unified executable (for CPU-only, OpenCL and CUDA)

Re: Unified executable (for CPU-only, OpenCL and CUDA)

Re: Unified executable (for CPU-only, OpenCL and CUDA)

Re: Unified executable (for CPU-only, OpenCL and CUDA)

Re: Unified executable (for CPU-only, OpenCL and CUDA)

Re: Unified executable (for CPU-only, OpenCL and CUDA)

Re: Unified executable (for CPU-only, OpenCL and CUDA)

Re: Unified executable (for CPU-only, OpenCL and CUDA)