Show your work, get help, participate in development
https://forums.luxcorerender.org/
Yes i meant resolution 2000 X 2000. But normally it should faster than my "cold fusion" render (60 hours) as it is laserB.Y.O.B. wrote: Sat Feb 10, 2018 1:29 pm I think sharlybg meant the resolution (2000x2000 or so).
Still pretty hard to do.
Maybe Dade's tips from here can help? viewtopic.php?f=2&t=94#p1434
Yes, that's the reason why I reduced eye path depth from 64 to 5 and light path depth from 64 to 12. I also used a low scattering value and some absorption on the single scattering volume.B.Y.O.B. wrote: Sat Feb 10, 2018 1:29 pm I think sharlybg meant the resolution (2000x2000 or so).
Still pretty hard to do.
Maybe Dade's tips from here can help? viewtopic.php?f=2&t=94#p1434
But there i think you loose too much GI quality. we must be able to render it at quality very close to the first render .Yes, that's the reason why I reduced eye path depth from 64 to 5 and light path depth from 64 to 12. I also used a low scattering value and some absorption on the single scattering volume.