OpenImageDenoise

Discussion related to the LuxCore functionality, implementations and API.
Post Reply
User avatar
lacilaci
Donor
Donor
Posts: 1969
Joined: Fri May 04, 2018 5:16 am

OpenImageDenoise

Post by lacilaci »

openimage denoise by intel is released
https://openimagedenoise.github.io
User avatar
FarbigeWelt
Donor
Donor
Posts: 1034
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:07 pm
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: CGI tech news box

Post by FarbigeWelt »

lacilaci wrote: Tue Jan 29, 2019 7:33 pm openimage denoise by intel is released
https://openimagedenoise.github.io
Interesting news! But the online sample looses sharpness and has a hue shift. Did you observe the same?
Light and Word designing Creator - www.farbigewelt.ch - aka quantenkristall || #luxcorerender
Windows 10 Pro 64 || 2x16 Cores, AMD Ryzen 3950X @3.5GHz, 64 GB RAM, DDR4 @3.2 GHz
2x openCL, AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, 8 GB VRAM || Gfp = SFFT Gflops
User avatar
lacilaci
Donor
Donor
Posts: 1969
Joined: Fri May 04, 2018 5:16 am

Re: CGI tech news box

Post by lacilaci »

FarbigeWelt wrote: Tue Jan 29, 2019 7:47 pm
lacilaci wrote: Tue Jan 29, 2019 7:33 pm openimage denoise by intel is released
https://openimagedenoise.github.io
Interesting news! But the online sample looses sharpness and has a hue shift. Did you observe the same?
hm. I only checked the gallery. look at crytek sponza at 16spp. BCD would not be able to do anything there...
also, unlike nvidia denoiser, this runs on cpu...
User avatar
B.Y.O.B.
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4146
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:08 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: CGI tech news box

Post by B.Y.O.B. »

You can actually test it, they have a standalone terminal application like the Declan Russel optix program.
https://github.com/OpenImageDenoise/oidn/releases
It's in the "bin" directory. The needed libraries are in "lib", so you will either have to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to "lib" or copy them over. (this is for the Linux version, have not checked the Windows archive)
User avatar
Sharlybg
Donor
Donor
Posts: 3079
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:11 pm
Location: Ivory Coast

Re: CGI tech news box

Post by Sharlybg »

look at crytek sponza at 16spp
Dont't know why but this sponza look like overboosted photoshoped advertising :?
Support LuxCoreRender project with salts and bounties

Portfolio : https://www.behance.net/DRAVIA
User avatar
lacilaci
Donor
Donor
Posts: 1969
Joined: Fri May 04, 2018 5:16 am

Re: CGI tech news box

Post by lacilaci »

B.Y.O.B. wrote: Tue Jan 29, 2019 7:57 pm You can actually test it, they have a standalone terminal application like the Declan Russel optix program.
https://github.com/OpenImageDenoise/oidn/releases
It's in the "bin" directory. The needed libraries are in "lib", so you will either have to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to "lib" or copy them over. (this is for the Linux version, have not checked the Windows archive)
will check it out tomorrow. But, it also uses albedo and normal passes for detail preservation.... there is no albedo in luxcore :(
User avatar
B.Y.O.B.
Developer
Developer
Posts: 4146
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:08 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: CGI tech news box

Post by B.Y.O.B. »

Here's a quick test.
I saved as EXR and used this as the only input, no albedo or normal AOV.
The standalone application is a bit of a pain to use because it only supports PFM images, so you have to convert everything back and forth.
And it only supports little endian PFM, not big endian. So your imagemagick line should be:

Code: Select all

convert noisy.exr -endian LSB noisy.pfm
Then you can feed noisy.pfm into the program.

Also note that this test is missing a ground truth image.
Attachments
BCD
BCD
OpenImageDenoise
OpenImageDenoise
noisy input, 64 samples
noisy input, 64 samples
User avatar
lacilaci
Donor
Donor
Posts: 1969
Joined: Fri May 04, 2018 5:16 am

Re: CGI tech news box

Post by lacilaci »

I'm on phone, but it looks like intels denoiser is way better. With extra passes it could be a killer feature not only for previews but for final frames too!
epilectrolytics
Donor
Donor
Posts: 778
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:06 am

Re: CGI tech news box

Post by epilectrolytics »

Looks great, I totally want this :!:
Maybe this works even on Bidir?
User avatar
lacilaci
Donor
Donor
Posts: 1969
Joined: Fri May 04, 2018 5:16 am

Re: CGI tech news box

Post by lacilaci »

epilectrolytics wrote: Tue Jan 29, 2019 8:26 pm Looks great, I totally want this :!:
Maybe this works even on Bidir?
Well if we will have indirect and caustic caching you won't need bidir, would you? + this type of denoiser and rendertimes will be in minutes for complex scenes
Post Reply