Test scences GPU Path vs CPU BiDir
- FarbigeWelt
- Donor
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:07 pm
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Test scences GPU Path vs CPU BiDir
(EDITED: Use of attachments looks better than linked images.)
I prefer rendering with a dual GPU setup because CPU is often slower for simple scences. But what means a simple scene? It seems this means scences based on materials like matte or mirror. But as soon as glossy or metal with roughness is involved rendering gets more complex.
First I forgot to disable environmental light. This lead to some unexptected result.
CPU BiDir GPU Path Setting evironmental light to none improved the rendering.
CPU BiDir GPU Path Then I replaced point lamp with a plane, material matte, opacity 0.0, emission.
CPU BiDir GPU Path Because of missing colors and orientation I've added a colorful map to the material of the outer cube.
CPU BiDir GPU Path, adaptive 0
I prefer rendering with a dual GPU setup because CPU is often slower for simple scences. But what means a simple scene? It seems this means scences based on materials like matte or mirror. But as soon as glossy or metal with roughness is involved rendering gets more complex.
First I forgot to disable environmental light. This lead to some unexptected result.
CPU BiDir GPU Path Setting evironmental light to none improved the rendering.
CPU BiDir GPU Path Then I replaced point lamp with a plane, material matte, opacity 0.0, emission.
CPU BiDir GPU Path Because of missing colors and orientation I've added a colorful map to the material of the outer cube.
CPU BiDir GPU Path, adaptive 0
Last edited by FarbigeWelt on Sat Jul 07, 2018 4:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- FarbigeWelt
- Donor
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:07 pm
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
- FarbigeWelt
- Donor
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:07 pm
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Procedural Texture
GPU Path, 11 min.
- FarbigeWelt
- Donor
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:07 pm
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Strange effect using volume, CPU BiDir
Today, I tried to setup a simple scence with a glass of wine. But no matter which glass property I changed I was not confident with the result.
In the last setup I noticed a scattered beam above the glass. I miss specular reflections too. What is wrong with this scene and objects?
In the last setup I noticed a scattered beam above the glass. I miss specular reflections too. What is wrong with this scene and objects?
Light and Word designing Creator - www.farbigewelt.ch - aka quantenkristall || #luxcorerender
MacBook Air with M1
MacBook Air with M1
- FarbigeWelt
- Donor
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:07 pm
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Test scences GPU Path vs CPU BiDir
Repost pictures of lenses in cube again here. Attachment of Blender file is in first post.
CPU BiDir Additional picture
CPU BiDir Additional picture
Light and Word designing Creator - www.farbigewelt.ch - aka quantenkristall || #luxcorerender
MacBook Air with M1
MacBook Air with M1
Re: Strange effect using volume, CPU BiDir
- some of your materials have incorrect interior/exterior volume settings (e.g. the "MatteWhite" material has no exterior volume specified, it should be set to "Air").
- This in turn makes the automatic volume detection of the camera fail. So you should either make sure that every last material in your scene has correct interior/exterior volume settings, or you have to specify the camera volume manually.
- The wine is modelled incorrectly, there is a gap between glass and wine. The wine mesh should overlap into the glass mesh, and the glass volume should be set to a higher priority than the wine volume, so it replaces the wine where the two volumes overlap.
- I would always use the Metropolis sampler with Bidir, with the only exception being that Random/Sobol are better if you are rendering with the denoiser. Without denoiser, Metropolis is the best sampler for Bidir.
by the way, the bottom of the glass looks too large to me.
Well, you placed a spotlight above the glass? Not sure what you expected?In the last setup I noticed a scattered beam above the glass.
With the changes mentioned above, I get the attached result.
Re: Strange effect using volume, CPU BiDir
I have a question about volumes: shouldn't it World Volume be used when no volume is specified for the material?
And another one: when there's glass with liquid in it, both glass and liquid have air on one side and liquid/glass on the other side, what exterior volume should be used for liquid and glass?
CPU Bidir + Metropolis | Core i5-4570
- FarbigeWelt
- Donor
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:07 pm
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Strange effect using volume, CPU BiDir
Hi B.Y.O.B.
Thanks for the answers and the tips.
I did not know how important setting of external and internal volume is.
The gap was intended. But good to know that overlapping is the correct solution.
Also setting priority for volumes is rather new to me.
"by the way, the bottom of the glass looks too large to me."
Maybe, but there are really a lot of shapes for wine glasses in a store with a broad sortiment.
"Metropolis sampler with Bidir"
Due to installation issues I still use version 2.0. Metropolis is default here for BiDir.
"Well, you placed a spotlight above the glass? Not sure what you expected? "
Actually I expected beam reaching top of wine but instead it disapears entering the glass. And there are not any speculars on the surface.
Thanks for the answers and the tips.
I did not know how important setting of external and internal volume is.
The gap was intended. But good to know that overlapping is the correct solution.
Also setting priority for volumes is rather new to me.
"by the way, the bottom of the glass looks too large to me."
Maybe, but there are really a lot of shapes for wine glasses in a store with a broad sortiment.
"Metropolis sampler with Bidir"
Due to installation issues I still use version 2.0. Metropolis is default here for BiDir.
"Well, you placed a spotlight above the glass? Not sure what you expected? "
Actually I expected beam reaching top of wine but instead it disapears entering the glass. And there are not any speculars on the surface.
Light and Word designing Creator - www.farbigewelt.ch - aka quantenkristall || #luxcorerender
MacBook Air with M1
MacBook Air with M1
Re: Test scences GPU Path vs CPU BiDir
Yes I would expect this too, but I am not sure LuxCore does this correctly at the moment.
The Blender addon does not handle this because I thought LuxCore would do it, but either my expectation was wrong or it's not correct in LuxCore.
I created a github issue so I don't forget it: https://github.com/LuxCoreRender/BlendL ... issues/187
In this case, both should use "Air" as exterior volume. The volume priority code handles the other transition cases correctly as far as I know, so on the boundary of glass and liquid the rays will be correctly refracted.
Ah, this is what you meant, makes sense.FarbigeWelt wrote: ↑Sat Jul 07, 2018 9:51 pm "Well, you placed a spotlight above the glass? Not sure what you expected? "
Actually I expected beam reaching top of wine but instead it disapears entering the glass. And there are not any speculars on the surface.
To be honest I'm not sure what's happening there, would require further investigation.
- FarbigeWelt
- Donor
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:07 pm
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re:Strange effect using volume, CPU BiDir
Yes, and as you can see, beam above spot of second spot light is not visible.
It seems for me, light passing homogenous, scattering volume keeps scattering outside the volume.
It seems for me, light passing homogenous, scattering volume keeps scattering outside the volume.
Light and Word designing Creator - www.farbigewelt.ch - aka quantenkristall || #luxcorerender
MacBook Air with M1
MacBook Air with M1