AMD Radeon 5700XT not ready yet?
Re: AMD Radeon 5700XT not ready yet?
Strange to have less than 1070ti performance with This 5700XT in luxcore.
- FarbigeWelt
- Donor
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:07 pm
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: AMD Radeon 5700XT not ready yet?
Indeed!
Geekbench 4.0
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
170559
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
332502, AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, 3.6/4.25 GHz, 6 Cores, 12 Threads, DDR4 SDRAM 1600MHz
204378, AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, 3.8/4.23 GHz, 12 Cores, 24 Threads, DDR4 SDRAM 1588MHz
I cannot see any reason why one system is 1.5 times faster. Most systems have approx. the speed of the slower system. This means the card is currently 10 to 20% faster than 1070 Ti.
According to some prof. HW tester current AMD openCL driver for 5700 XT is weak what may explain the bad LuxCoreRender values.
Light and Word designing Creator - www.farbigewelt.ch - aka quantenkristall || #luxcorerender
MacBook Air with M1
MacBook Air with M1
-
- Donor
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:06 am
Re: AMD Radeon 5700XT not ready yet?
I really hope there will be better drivers soon so that you can get the best out of your hardware!FarbigeWelt wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:40 pm According to some prof. HW tester current AMD openCL driver for 5700 XT is weak what may explain the bad LuxCoreRender values.
Can you share some Luxmark results?
Edit: Oops, I see they are already in the table
- FarbigeWelt
- Donor
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:07 pm
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: AMD Radeon 5700XT not ready yet?
Actually shared already in the picture of the table attached to a former post.epilectrolytics wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:45 pm I really hope there will be better drivers soon so that you can get the best out of your hardware!
Can you share some Luxmark results?
Edit: Oops, I see they are already in the table
But well...
Code: Select all
LuxMark 3.1
Company Card GPU Hotel Lobby
AMD R9 290X Hawaii 2453
AMD 5700 XT gfx1010 3060
Light and Word designing Creator - www.farbigewelt.ch - aka quantenkristall || #luxcorerender
MacBook Air with M1
MacBook Air with M1
Re: AMD Radeon 5700XT not ready yet?
Any possibility to ask AMD if RDNA 5700(XT) performance under Luxmark are correct or Driver Limited ?
- FarbigeWelt
- Donor
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:07 pm
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: AMD Radeon 5700XT not ready yet?
I thought to ask them some day. I may ask AMD soon because it looks like real issue. The low score makes not any sense.
I‘ll follow up if I get a reasonable reply.
Light and Word designing Creator - www.farbigewelt.ch - aka quantenkristall || #luxcorerender
MacBook Air with M1
MacBook Air with M1
Re: AMD Radeon 5700XT not ready yet?
A guy from AMD just said that 5700 XT perform closer to Vega VII in prorender and sometime beat it in that same render engine.
https://blenderartists.org/t/radeon-rx- ... /1167923/8
https://blenderartists.org/t/radeon-rx- ... /1167923/8
DISCLOSURE: I AM AN AMD EMPLOYEE
I’m not sure what you mean by this. But Here’s what I’ll say. I work on ProRender for AMD, (check out our blender addon!) . Without Quoting numbers in RPR under OpenCL, render times for 5700XT cards are similar and sometimes slightly better than Radeon VII.
And you can look up Radeon VII benchmarks here independently here: https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/am ... 977-4.html 41
- FarbigeWelt
- Donor
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:07 pm
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: AMD Radeon 5700XT not ready yet?
There are fresh benchmarks (linux) available showing increased performance due to driver optimizations.
Another Look At The Maturing AMD Radeon RX 5700 Series Linux Performance
Another Look At The Maturing AMD Radeon RX 5700 Series Linux Performance
Light and Word designing Creator - www.farbigewelt.ch - aka quantenkristall || #luxcorerender
MacBook Air with M1
MacBook Air with M1
Re: AMD Radeon 5700XT not ready yet?
https://www.techspot.com/article/1874-a ... hitecture/
I wonder how this working for GPU rendering engine. Is RDNA better or Turing ?As to which design is better all comes down to how they get used: a program that generates lots of threads performing FP32 vector calculations and little else would seem to favor Navi, whereas a program with a variety of integer, float, scalar and vector calculations would favor the flexibility of Turing, and so on.