Two well known luxcore problems.

Discussion related to the LuxCore functionality, implementations and API.
User avatar
Dade
Developer
Developer
Posts: 5672
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:36 pm
Location: Italy

Re: Two well known luxcore problems.

Post by Dade »

Have you done a full rebuild ("make clean") ?
Support LuxCoreRender project with salts and bounties
User avatar
chuchur
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2020 8:44 am

Re: Two well known luxcore problems.

Post by chuchur »

Yes, sure. After rerunning cmake everything works fine again. I haven't fetched for a long time.
Martini
Posts: 125
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2018 11:36 am
Location: Australia

Re: Two well known luxcore problems.

Post by Martini »

Martini wrote: Mon Aug 23, 2021 4:22 pm From what I can guess/observe by looking at the render result, it looks like the transmission is not present in the rough glass, and perhaps the normals are a bit weird also.
Looks like roughglass is working spectacularly well in latest build (sorry for not testing for a few days) :D
LuxCore roughglass
LuxCore roughglass
Thanks Dade
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 64-Cores | 2x Gigabyte RTX 4090 Gaming OC
ASUS Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI | 256GB Kingston Server Premier ECC Unbuffered DDR4
User avatar
Sharlybg
Donor
Donor
Posts: 3101
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:11 pm
Location: Ivory Coast

Re: Two well known luxcore problems.

Post by Sharlybg »

Do you mean that the lastest Blendluxcore daily build have it.
Support LuxCoreRender project with salts and bounties

Portfolio : https://www.behance.net/DRAVIA
Martini
Posts: 125
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2018 11:36 am
Location: Australia

Re: Two well known luxcore problems.

Post by Martini »

Sharlybg wrote: Sat Sep 04, 2021 7:46 am Do you mean that the lastest Blendluxcore daily build have it.
I only downloaded the standalone binaries from LuxCoreRender, but yes, the same ones should be included automatically in daily builds of BlendLuxCore as well.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 64-Cores | 2x Gigabyte RTX 4090 Gaming OC
ASUS Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI | 256GB Kingston Server Premier ECC Unbuffered DDR4
User avatar
Sharlybg
Donor
Donor
Posts: 3101
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:11 pm
Location: Ivory Coast

Re: Two well known luxcore problems.

Post by Sharlybg »

On my side wit lasest blendluxcore build the darkening issue is still there :
rough_ball.jpg
rough_glass.blend
(988.33 KiB) Downloaded 110 times
I don't how it is possible to solve it without a multiscatter glass model.Cycles solve it this way of course. the non scattering version aka ggx give same dark result as lux. And you have to put it in multi scattering ggx for this to work.
Support LuxCoreRender project with salts and bounties

Portfolio : https://www.behance.net/DRAVIA
kintuX
Posts: 810
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2018 2:37 am

Re: Two well known luxcore problems.

Post by kintuX »

Naive thought here...
:?
Would it be possible to get a trick like "NO Energy loss" (no lightloss, no falloff or best - customizable control for light falloff) or switch to affect specular & glossy materials, so in principal, a user could create rough glass as bright as Env. light?
epilectrolytics
Donor
Donor
Posts: 790
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:06 am

Re: Two well known luxcore problems.

Post by epilectrolytics »

kintuX wrote: Sun Sep 05, 2021 8:38 pm Would it be possible to get a trick like "NO Energy loss"
Agreed, in Cycles you can configure a glass material (using "ray depth" node or sth.) that does not return black after the last bounce but instead switches to transparent and thus guarantees bright glass appearance.
If this could be somehow coded into Lux glass shader maybe the problem were solved?
User avatar
Sharlybg
Donor
Donor
Posts: 3101
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 10:11 pm
Location: Ivory Coast

Re: Two well known luxcore problems.

Post by Sharlybg »

Why go this way if a more accurate less tricky way exist (multi scattering rough glass) ?
Support LuxCoreRender project with salts and bounties

Portfolio : https://www.behance.net/DRAVIA
epilectrolytics
Donor
Donor
Posts: 790
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:06 am

Re: Two well known luxcore problems.

Post by epilectrolytics »

Sharlybg wrote: Mon Sep 06, 2021 7:52 am Why go this way if a more accurate less tricky way exist (multi scattering rough glass) ?
The tricky thing is probably easier to implement (though I don't know really), and maybe rendering faster?
If there is a major overhaul of LuxCore via Cuda-C++ with all new materials before us it makes no sense to waste effort updating old materials.
If the Cuda-C++ thing is still years away I'd agree that it would be best to integrate multi scattering into rough glass now, because we need a solution for this.
Post Reply