LuxCoreRender Forums

This is a rendering with intentionally fast RR settings ( 6.12M samples/sec ): good.jpg As you see I can manipolate the samples/sec however I want. But check the "rays per samples": the first one traces ~36 rays per samples while the last one only ~4 per samples. Clearly the last one is p...

I think it will be really interesting to see.

occasionally I use luxcore for daily work or personal one and the main issue I got is the noise, particularly for the direct light.
I've tried to use clamping but the lighting contrast become easily a big problem.

and now..concave shape ...

fantastic job!!

Nice modelling and shading... and nice subject! What a lovely car! As Italian I'm really proud of this great piece of industrial design. Anyway, about the model, the only thing that catch my eyes as an error it's the hood. The side part of it it's too hard-edged. It's should be more smoothy. Look at...

Tried with Edge browser and it's broken.
As previous, tried from Italy.

I can see it rightly. Italy, using Firefox

clear.
But I'm quite sure that anyone used it cause it was just wrong.

I'd like to read something by the other users.

Probably this could be workarounded by the Blender addon...but in my opinion is adding complexity "for nothing".

Good..really good. I've a question about the "reverse" option. Is it there due to a compatibility or another reason? I'm asking this cause I can't understand how a white balancing system could work differently from this "reverse" way. I mean...as I know...a white balance in photo...

It's working fine now.

Thank you!!