Search found 19 matches
- Mon May 08, 2023 4:41 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: A flatpak for LuxMark 3 to debug work-in-progress OpenCL platforms on Linux
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11172
Re: A flatpak for LuxMark 3 to debug work-in-progress OpenCL platforms on Linux
The flatpak is still not published to flathub because I'm waiting for an answer from developers.
- Fri Apr 07, 2023 12:23 am
- Forum: Development
- Topic: A flatpak for LuxMark 3 to debug work-in-progress OpenCL platforms on Linux
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11172
Re: A flatpak for LuxMark 3 to debug work-in-progress OpenCL platforms on Linux
Also, what is the name that would be preferred? This may be:
- info.luxmark.luxmark3
- org.luxcorerender.luxmark3
- Fri Apr 07, 2023 12:21 am
- Forum: Development
- Topic: A flatpak for LuxMark 3 to debug work-in-progress OpenCL platforms on Linux
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11172
Re: A flatpak for LuxMark 3 to debug work-in-progress OpenCL platforms on Linux
Hi, the flatpak recipe is now ready since a very long time, I would like to make sure I can safely tick that checkbox when submitting it to flathub:
- [ ] I am an upstream contributor to the project. If not, I contacted upstream developers about submitting their software to Flathub.
- [ ] I am an upstream contributor to the project. If not, I contacted upstream developers about submitting their software to Flathub.
- Tue Oct 25, 2022 12:01 am
- Forum: Development
- Topic: A flatpak for LuxMark 3 to debug work-in-progress OpenCL platforms on Linux
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11172
Re: My heavily patched LuxMark 3 to debug work-in-progress OpenCL platforms
I updated the flatpak to also build SLG4. Now the flatpak provides no less features than the original 3.1 LuxMark release:
https://github.com/illwieckz/flathub/tree/luxmark3
https://github.com/illwieckz/flathub/tree/luxmark3
- Mon Oct 24, 2022 6:00 am
- Forum: Development
- Topic: A flatpak for LuxMark 3 to debug work-in-progress OpenCL platforms on Linux
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11172
Re: My heavily patched LuxMark 3 to debug work-in-progress OpenCL platforms
I added patches to replace the now name-squatted luxrender-dot-net urls by the current https://luxcorerender.org one. I also added patches enabling build on aarch64. I have not tested yet if aarch64 flatpak builds but non-flatpak build works. Outside of the question about the name of the flatpak, to...
- Fri Oct 21, 2022 10:20 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: A flatpak for LuxMark 3 to debug work-in-progress OpenCL platforms on Linux
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11172
Re: My heavily patched LuxMark 3 to debug work-in-progress OpenCL platforms
Here is my work-in-progress flatpak recipe: https://github.com/illwieckz/flathub/tree/luxmark3
It is not submitted to flathub yet.
It is not submitted to flathub yet.
- Fri Oct 21, 2022 9:32 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: A flatpak for LuxMark 3 to debug work-in-progress OpenCL platforms on Linux
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11172
Re: My heavily patched LuxMark 3 to debug work-in-progress OpenCL platforms
I managed to build locally a luxmark3 flatpak that can be used with in-development OpenCL platforms. :) Before I submit it to flathub, what name should I give to this flatpak? I see two possibilities (it's a hierarchical name based on domain name): info.luxmark.luxmark3 org.luxcorerender.luxmark3 In...
- Fri Oct 21, 2022 1:12 am
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Is Rusticl the future of OpenCL for AMD cards on Linux?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 15582
Is Rusticl the future of OpenCL for AMD cards on Linux?
Rusticl is a work-in progress open source OpenCL driver developed within Mesa (like the radeonsi OpenGL driver and the radv Vulkan driver). It's not complete enough to run actual LuxCoreRender. It's even not complete enough to build non-LuxBall LuxMark scenes (in fact, that's because it is still inl...
- Fri Oct 21, 2022 1:04 am
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Looking for help to identify a regression when using Clang-based OpenCL platform with LuxMark/LuxCore
- Replies: 11
- Views: 13027
Re: Looking for help to identify a regression when using Clang-based OpenCL platform with LuxMark/LuxCore
That's also what Karol Herbst told me, that he expected that `min(1.0, infinty)` should return `1.0`… I believe it makes sense but I'm not a compiler wizard.
Here are some talks about it: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54947#issuecomment-1280119445
Here are some talks about it: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54947#issuecomment-1280119445
- Fri Oct 21, 2022 12:30 am
- Forum: Development
- Topic: A flatpak for LuxMark 3 to debug work-in-progress OpenCL platforms on Linux
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11172
A flatpak for LuxMark 3 to debug work-in-progress OpenCL platforms on Linux
For people interested in OpenCL platform development (Rusticl, Clover, name-your-own), here is my script to build and run a patched LuxMark 3 with many things to make it a good tool to debug OpenCL platforms: https://gitlab.com/illwieckz/i-love-compute#user-luxmark3 The LuxMark 3 tool is now patched...