PhotonGI cache
Re: PhotonGI cache
So clean for half the rendering time and note that it is still on CPU
Re: PhotonGI cache
Also, this was rendered on my 6 year old notebook.
edit: The CPU is a Intel i7-3635QM @ 2.40GHz.
Re: PhotonGI cache
OMG Why Why .............................................WhatAlso, this was rendered on my 6 year old notebook.
So this is not a fake and this is Lux futur and more
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_fim8l4yxc
Re: PhotonGI cache
Just tested, on my Ryzen 7 2700X the render with PhotonGI enabled takes 37 seconds plus 6 seconds init time to build the photon cache.
The render without PhotonGI takes 43 seconds, with 0.5 seconds init time (mostly to build the visibility map).
Of course the images look exactly the same as on my notebook, but surprising that the render times are nearly equal on this CPU.
The render without PhotonGI takes 43 seconds, with 0.5 seconds init time (mostly to build the visibility map).
Of course the images look exactly the same as on my notebook, but surprising that the render times are nearly equal on this CPU.
Re: PhotonGI cache
Strangebut surprising that the render times are nearly equal on this CPU.
Is PGI currently Multithreaded ?
-
- Donor
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:06 am
- alpistinho
- Developer
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2018 11:38 pm
- Location: Rio de Janeiro
Re: PhotonGI cache
Considering it's a comparison between a big desktop CPU and a small laptop one, I would bet on it being the opposite.epilectrolytics wrote: ↑Fri Feb 08, 2019 11:31 pmFrom my testing with LuxCoreUI: Yes.
But strange are the ways of the Ryzen
PGI is very RAM-intensive and I'm under the impression the AMD processors don't deal as well with that as the Intel ones.
The Ryzen probably has a much faster memory subsystem, using a newer memory technology. Besides, the Ryzen has a huge cache that probably can hide much better the memory latency.
I would guess that the Ryzen benefits less from caching the results than the notebook CPU, since it can better deal with the extra calculations in the first place
Re: PhotonGI cache
So is it supposed to be more obvious on a more complexe interior with longer rendertime that tje ryzen is faster by a lot?
Will be strange to have a threadripper 2950x playing like a simple i7 8700k.
Will be strange to have a threadripper 2950x playing like a simple i7 8700k.
Re: PhotonGI cache
Also please can you compare yoir laptop and the ryzen with PGI on the dining room interior bench ?
Re: PhotonGI cache
Here's a comparison with 3 minute rendering and very low photonGI settings (~2sec preprocessing)
pathtracing only pathtracing + photongi with plain unicolor walls it is quite extreme setting but the boost is incredible.
pathtracing only pathtracing + photongi with plain unicolor walls it is quite extreme setting but the boost is incredible.