Hi
Get strange result for interior render
8:21 Out of Core option on 16 supersamples
and
9:59 Out of Core option off 512 samples
Out of Core option is more faster than standart render mode?
Out of Core option again
Forum rules
Please upload a testscene that allows developers to reproduce the problem, and attach some images.
Please upload a testscene that allows developers to reproduce the problem, and attach some images.
Re: Out of Core option again
I assume you have an halt condition of 512 samples per pixel in both case. Indeed, the result looks strange, can you post a test scene ?
Re: Out of Core option again
ok i ll do it later
Re: Out of Core option again
https://yadi.sk/d/nimVeZgCWIS6Ag
it is too big
last test
1:14 sek (Out of Core on) 128
1:30 sek (Out of Core off) 128
Win7 GTX1070 LuxCore(12.06)
it is too big
last test
1:14 sek (Out of Core on) 128
1:30 sek (Out of Core off) 128
Win7 GTX1070 LuxCore(12.06)
Re: Out of Core option again
I'm getting the same rendering time with or without OoC option On/Off, about 26secs on my RTX 2070 Super. The scene is missing the required texture maps but I doubt that it would make any difference.
Your result may be related to some specific hardware characteristic of the GTX 1070, like OoC option fitting well, its work-set, in some hardware cache, etc.
As explained in viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2121, Random/Sobol sampler: "Out-of-Core" mode has more cache friendly behavior (at the cost of not being progressive at all so it isn't good for previews, etc.).