CIE 171:2006
Forum rules
Please upload a testscene that allows developers to reproduce the problem, and attach some images.
Please upload a testscene that allows developers to reproduce the problem, and attach some images.
-
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2018 6:02 pm
CIE 171:2006
Hi,
Does anyone know about this CIE 171:2006?
It's a report that handles "Test cases to assess the accuracy of lighting computer programs".
Do you know how luxcorerender will fit into this?
Thanks.
BR
Does anyone know about this CIE 171:2006?
It's a report that handles "Test cases to assess the accuracy of lighting computer programs".
Do you know how luxcorerender will fit into this?
Thanks.
BR
OS - Windows 7 X64
CPU - Intel CORE i7
GPU1 - Variants of notebook card from nVidia
GPU2 - Variants of notebook onboard card from Intel
Lux - Latest possible relaease
CPU - Intel CORE i7
GPU1 - Variants of notebook card from nVidia
GPU2 - Variants of notebook onboard card from Intel
Lux - Latest possible relaease
-
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2018 6:02 pm
Re: CIE 171:2006
Yes, that's why I was hoping that someone knows about its content already.
OS - Windows 7 X64
CPU - Intel CORE i7
GPU1 - Variants of notebook card from nVidia
GPU2 - Variants of notebook onboard card from Intel
Lux - Latest possible relaease
CPU - Intel CORE i7
GPU1 - Variants of notebook card from nVidia
GPU2 - Variants of notebook onboard card from Intel
Lux - Latest possible relaease
-
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2018 6:02 pm
Re: CIE 171:2006
Hi,
I bought the document, but I think I'm not allowed to share it. It mentions a range of test cases that should compare the calculated/simulated results with some analytical and measured values.
Within the next days I'll gonna try to run through each of the tests with luxcorerender...
Are you interested in sharing the results?
BR
I bought the document, but I think I'm not allowed to share it. It mentions a range of test cases that should compare the calculated/simulated results with some analytical and measured values.
Within the next days I'll gonna try to run through each of the tests with luxcorerender...
Are you interested in sharing the results?
BR
OS - Windows 7 X64
CPU - Intel CORE i7
GPU1 - Variants of notebook card from nVidia
GPU2 - Variants of notebook onboard card from Intel
Lux - Latest possible relaease
CPU - Intel CORE i7
GPU1 - Variants of notebook card from nVidia
GPU2 - Variants of notebook onboard card from Intel
Lux - Latest possible relaease
Re: CIE 171:2006
Sure, post the results and if they don't match, we can (probably) fix the problem.
-
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2018 6:02 pm
Re: CIE 171:2006
Hi,
I've just finished my first attempt for the first (out of 12 or more) test cases.
If my process is correct, there seems to be a serious issue with working with IES files.
Please have a look into the attached documentation and the corresponding blend files.
I'm happy for every oppinion and every feedback.
Thank you.
I've just finished my first attempt for the first (out of 12 or more) test cases.
If my process is correct, there seems to be a serious issue with working with IES files.
Please have a look into the attached documentation and the corresponding blend files.
I'm happy for every oppinion and every feedback.
Thank you.
OS - Windows 7 X64
CPU - Intel CORE i7
GPU1 - Variants of notebook card from nVidia
GPU2 - Variants of notebook onboard card from Intel
Lux - Latest possible relaease
CPU - Intel CORE i7
GPU1 - Variants of notebook card from nVidia
GPU2 - Variants of notebook onboard card from Intel
Lux - Latest possible relaease
Re: CIE 171:2006
Look like there is an error here 2.1 cm instead of 2.1mm radius :lighting_freak wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 10:04 am Hi,
I've just finished my first attempt for the first (out of 12 or more) test cases.
If my process is correct, there seems to be a serious issue with working with IES files.
Please have a look into the attached documentation and the corresponding blend files.
I'm happy for every oppinion and every feedback.
190506_CIE_TC4.1.zip
Thank you.
-
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2018 6:02 pm
Re: CIE 171:2006
Hello all,
Unfortunatly its only a typo in the report and the blender setting is right. It should be 2,1cm.
Never the less the main critical point is the calculation using an IES file...
As soon as we've found a way to perform this calculations correctly, I can run a loop with the "real" given photometry, which is almost an isometric point, but not perfectly...
BR
thanks for first notification.Look like there is an error here 2.1 cm instead of 2.1mm radius :
Unfortunatly its only a typo in the report and the blender setting is right. It should be 2,1cm.
Never the less the main critical point is the calculation using an IES file...
As soon as we've found a way to perform this calculations correctly, I can run a loop with the "real" given photometry, which is almost an isometric point, but not perfectly...
BR
OS - Windows 7 X64
CPU - Intel CORE i7
GPU1 - Variants of notebook card from nVidia
GPU2 - Variants of notebook onboard card from Intel
Lux - Latest possible relaease
CPU - Intel CORE i7
GPU1 - Variants of notebook card from nVidia
GPU2 - Variants of notebook onboard card from Intel
Lux - Latest possible relaease
-
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2018 6:02 pm
Re: CIE 171:2006
Hi,
This is belonging report for Nvidia's iray: Wouldn't it be nice to place an information like in this commercial raytracer on luxcorerender webpage?
https://www.optis-world.com/Showcase/Ne ... nation-CIE
I guess this will attract lot of users, especially from professional point of view.
But I really need some help from your side...
Do you think handling the cases like I did is suitable.
Does the described process seem right to you?
It's the report quality enough to follow each step?
BR
This is belonging report for Nvidia's iray: Wouldn't it be nice to place an information like in this commercial raytracer on luxcorerender webpage?
https://www.optis-world.com/Showcase/Ne ... nation-CIE
I guess this will attract lot of users, especially from professional point of view.
But I really need some help from your side...
Do you think handling the cases like I did is suitable.
Does the described process seem right to you?
It's the report quality enough to follow each step?
BR
OS - Windows 7 X64
CPU - Intel CORE i7
GPU1 - Variants of notebook card from nVidia
GPU2 - Variants of notebook onboard card from Intel
Lux - Latest possible relaease
CPU - Intel CORE i7
GPU1 - Variants of notebook card from nVidia
GPU2 - Variants of notebook onboard card from Intel
Lux - Latest possible relaease
Re: CIE 171:2006
Hello,
I am also highly interested in this side project. Currently I am trying to utilise LuxCore to simulate an optical floating zone furnace for crystal growth. Testing LuxCore against CIE171:2006 is a great idea and, in my opinion, worth the effort.
So far, I had a look at the source code of the IES-Importer. Everything looks good there. Next step would be to find out, how the candela values are further processed. Maybe I have some time within the next days to crawl through the repository to get some new input.
Best regards,
MS
I am also highly interested in this side project. Currently I am trying to utilise LuxCore to simulate an optical floating zone furnace for crystal growth. Testing LuxCore against CIE171:2006 is a great idea and, in my opinion, worth the effort.
So far, I had a look at the source code of the IES-Importer. Everything looks good there. Next step would be to find out, how the candela values are further processed. Maybe I have some time within the next days to crawl through the repository to get some new input.
Best regards,
MS