Benchmarks / OS with CPU | GPUs
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:50 am
On last Saturday I collected some historical data for examples of CPUs viewtopic.php?f=2&t=875#p9385 and GPU sviewtopic.php?f=2&t=875#p9394. The performance (TFLOPS) in these collections are based on say PR notes and tech sheets of supplier or 'in'dependent reviewers.
Over the last days I've run different benchmarks on different systems, LuxCoreRender 2.1 plugin for Blender 2,79b rendering own scenes (2.4 MTriangles, 10 lights, 300 MB VRAM, no textures) or I used LuxMark 3.1. Latter's Microphone scene did not like my mid 2010 27'' iMac and crashed, see attachment.
Wondering about differences of LuxCoreRender and LuxMark benchmarks' top order I noticed remembered Geekbench version 4 http://www.geekbench.com which is very different to its former versions.
Single tests are obviously free, you can licence later or never and continue to start CPU and then openCL tests. After testing a browser tab opens and shows all kind of results.
I guess for a small evaluation it would be enough to gather GB 4.0 results with Gflops for
SFFT for GPU and CPU
SGEMM for CPU (if available DGEMM).
Together with the results of path render for e.g. the scene CPU
openCL
and who likes: openCL + CPU
I would like to compare these values with LuxCoreRender speed on different systems. Results of 6 to 10 different systems should be enough for my evaluation. Useful for later analyses, GBs 4.0 all results are uploaded as pdf print because e.g. RAM speed could be a very important factor for the render benchmark.
Who like to support me with data?
Over the last days I've run different benchmarks on different systems, LuxCoreRender 2.1 plugin for Blender 2,79b rendering own scenes (2.4 MTriangles, 10 lights, 300 MB VRAM, no textures) or I used LuxMark 3.1. Latter's Microphone scene did not like my mid 2010 27'' iMac and crashed, see attachment.
Wondering about differences of LuxCoreRender and LuxMark benchmarks' top order I noticed remembered Geekbench version 4 http://www.geekbench.com which is very different to its former versions.
Single tests are obviously free, you can licence later or never and continue to start CPU and then openCL tests. After testing a browser tab opens and shows all kind of results.
I guess for a small evaluation it would be enough to gather GB 4.0 results with Gflops for
SFFT for GPU and CPU
SGEMM for CPU (if available DGEMM).
Together with the results of path render for e.g. the scene CPU
openCL
and who likes: openCL + CPU
I would like to compare these values with LuxCoreRender speed on different systems. Results of 6 to 10 different systems should be enough for my evaluation. Useful for later analyses, GBs 4.0 all results are uploaded as pdf print because e.g. RAM speed could be a very important factor for the render benchmark.
Who like to support me with data?