LuxCoreRender Forums

B.Y.O.B. wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 9:08 pm With no camera volume instead of auto volume detection:

Yes, that's better! I see how different horizon line is. There's no difference if bump is disabled though.

B.Y.O.B. wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 8:10 pm I mean, what does it change in the atmosphere scene?

Sorry, I don't know. It renders too slowly on my GPU, so I didn't check. I just can't see any reason keep camera volume enabled. It either a) doesn't change anything or b) makes something worse.

Why, what does it change? Because it's bugged. https://github.com/LuxCoreRender/LuxCore/issues/220 This is how volume should look (red cube): https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/438829/60880110-28229200-a26d-11e9-932c-dc9c94b18efc.png And this is how it does look with camera volume enabled ht...

When I started the LuxCore render below, I forgot to add the ocean bump map, which I fixed since, so if you render the scene you'll get a slightly different ocean surface. 1. You also forgot to disable camera volume. I suggest removing it from blendluxcore until it fixed. 2. I tried to render it wi...

Another one

I get it. Volume was just too thin. There I multiplied scattering scale by 10:

Do you mind to share the scene?

There was similar trouble in 2.79 You had to set both "steps" parameters to equal number to have hair rendered as they are in viewport.
I can't see that another "step" in 2.8 though.

Upd: Found it. Try setting them to equal number.