LuxCoreRender Forums

You should use the Boost version provided with cmake-build-x64.bat: we don't support any other version.

Sharlybg wrote: ↑

Fri Jan 24, 2020 9:56 pm

Thanks for the explanation. Don't understand "" scale down the HDRi""" . My current hdri is 1k should i go to 0.3k or sometjing like that ?

For a test, there should be a large difference. Anyway, to get less noise in that image, the sun+sky combo should be the best one (with PGI and Env. cache).

Try to do a test without sun, only sky. Sun is not affected by Env. cache. P.S. I expect the same result but with "interference" from sun noise. There is no sun in fact in this test. it is pure HDRi lighting accross both render. It is one of that HDR with a very bright single pixel (i.e. sun), you ...

Try to do a test without sun, only sky. Sun is not affected by Env. cache.

P.S. I expect the same result but with "interference" from sun noise.

We could consider porting them to git, either on bitbucket or on our new github project. That would be a good thing, I think. From some initial test I did locally, conversion is not totally painless... I did the migration to GitHub at one point but the idea was than rejected. I have kept https://gi...

This is likely to be the same problem described here https://github.com/LuxCoreRender/LuxCore/issues/198 and I fixed the problem today.

Hi Dade, is there an example on how to use the glTF v2.0 FILESAVER? is it only in the API and is not exposed, or is there a way to use it without coding? Yes, there is a "Export (glTF)" in LuxCoreUI under menu "Rendering": https://github.com/LuxCoreRender/LuxCore/blob/c2d221bd1177c32195ec0f8db3947e...

You are using RTPATHOCL, how does it look with PATHOCL ?

The work on this topic for v2.3 is done. Any further development will continue on a branch for v2.4. Materials/Textures aside (v2.4 stuff), there are now only the following conditional compilations: - render engine type: PATHOCL, TILEPATHOCL and RTPATHOCL - epsilon min. and epsilon max. values; So, ...

Did you see any comparison between the bump and the new paralax bump in fstorm? You telling me this is not impressive? It is a fake and, like all fake techniques, it has draw backs (for instance the lack of shadows, it may have serious problems if seen trough mirrors and glasses, etc.). At the end ...